The Supreme Court’s Troxel Decision on Grandparents’ Rights

In June 2000, The United States Supreme Court addressed the issue of non-parent visitation rights, including grandparents’ rights to visitation, in a case called “Troxel”. At issue in Troxel was the constitutionality of a Washington State statute, which allowed grandparents and other non-parents to petition for visitation rights whenever the visitation would serve the child’s best interests.

In Troxel, the grandparents were awarded visitation rights with their deceased son’s children under the state’s broad non-parent visitation statute. The mother objected to the amount of visitation awarded to the grandparents and appealed. The Washington State Supreme Court found that the statute impermissibly interfered with a parent’s fundamental interest in the care, custody and companionship of the child. The Court held that a State may interfere with a parent’s fundamental right to raise his or her child only to prevent harm or potential harm to the child. Upon further review, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the decision and held that Washington’s non-parent visitation statute violated a parent’s due process right to be the sole decision maker in issues concerning their child.

Unfortunately, the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Troxel was based on the specific case-related facts and did not address the broader impact of non-parent visitation statutes across the country. The Troxel decision also fell short of establishing a hierarchy among the different classes of non-parents who seek visitation. Furthermore, Troxel failed to identify a uniform standard for analyzing the non-parent visitation statutes of an individual state.

Colorado’s third party and grandparent visitation statute faced a Troxel-like challenge in September 2002 in a case titled “In re Custody of C.M.” In C.M., the Colorado Court of Appeals upheld Colorado’s current visitation law. The Court found that, unlike the statute in Troxel, Colorado’s visitation statute limits standing to grandparents and permits a petition for visitation only if there is or has been a child custody case or a case concerning the allocation of parental responsibilities. The Court held that Colorado’s grandparents’ rights law does provide appropriate deference to parents’ fundamental rights to raise their children.

About Peggy Walker

Peggy Walker “Whether you mediate, collaborate, or go to trial, my years of experience help me provide you the best possible outcome.” I have practiced family law in Colorado and Kansas since 1977. My specialties include dissolution of marriage (divorce), collaborative law, mediation, conflict coaching for individuals, modification of child support, parenting time and parental responsibilities, as well as issues regarding paternity. In addition to working to ensure fair settlements in these cases, I also believe part of my role as an attorney is to educate my clients about the impact the law will have on their specific issues. I strive to help them understand the legal implications associated with their choices, and provide them with the information they need to make the best decisions for themselves and their families. View all posts by Peggy Walker →